| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 21:13:38 +0900
From: "Dongseok Yi" <dseok.yi@...sung.com>
To: "'Steffen Klassert'" <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: "'David S. Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"'Alexander Lobakin'" <alobakin@...me>, <namkyu78.kim@...sung.com>,
"'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"'Hideaki YOSHIFUJI'" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"'Willem de Bruijn'" <willemb@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v2] udp: ipv4: manipulate network header of NATed
UDP GRO fraglist
On 2021-01-20 15:56, Dongseok Yi wrote:
> On 2021-01-18 22:27, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:20:35PM +0900, Dongseok Yi wrote:
> > > UDP/IP header of UDP GROed frag_skbs are not updated even after NAT
> > > forwarding. Only the header of head_skb from ip_finish_output_gso ->
> > > skb_gso_segment is updated but following frag_skbs are not updated.
> > >
> > > A call path skb_mac_gso_segment -> inet_gso_segment ->
> > > udp4_ufo_fragment -> __udp_gso_segment -> __udp_gso_segment_list
> > > does not try to update UDP/IP header of the segment list but copy
> > > only the MAC header.
> > >
> > > Update dport, daddr and checksums of each skb of the segment list
> > > in __udp_gso_segment_list. It covers both SNAT and DNAT.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 (udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.)
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongseok Yi <dseok.yi@...sung.com>
> > > ---
> > > v1:
> > > Steffen Klassert said, there could be 2 options.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1362257/
> > > I was trying to write a quick fix, but it was not easy to forward
> > > segmented list. Currently, assuming DNAT only.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > Per Steffen Klassert request, move the procedure from
> > > udp4_ufo_fragment to __udp_gso_segment_list and support SNAT.
> > >
> > > To Alexander Lobakin, I've checked your email late. Just use this
> > > patch as a reference. It support SNAT too, but does not support IPv6
> > > yet. I cannot make IPv6 header changes in __udp_gso_segment_list due
> > > to the file is in IPv4 directory.
> > >
> > > include/net/udp.h | 2 +-
> > > net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/udp.h b/include/net/udp.h
> > > index 877832b..01351ba 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/udp.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/udp.h
> > > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct sk_buff *udp_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > int udp_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff, udp_lookup_t lookup);
> > >
> > > struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,
> > > - netdev_features_t features);
> > > + netdev_features_t features, bool is_ipv6);
> > >
> > > static inline struct udphdr *udp_gro_udphdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> > > index ff39e94..c532d3b 100644
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> > > @@ -187,8 +187,57 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_udp_tunnel_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_udp_tunnel_segment);
> > >
> > > +static void __udpv4_gso_segment_csum(struct sk_buff *seg,
> > > + __be32 *oldip, __be32 *newip,
> > > + __be16 *oldport, __be16 *newport)
> > > +{
> > > + struct udphdr *uh = udp_hdr(seg);
> > > + struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(seg);
> > > +
> > > + if (uh->check) {
> > > + inet_proto_csum_replace4(&uh->check, seg, *oldip, *newip,
> > > + true);
> > > + inet_proto_csum_replace2(&uh->check, seg, *oldport, *newport,
> > > + false);
> > > + if (!uh->check)
> > > + uh->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;
> > > + }
> > > + uh->dest = *newport;
> > > +
> > > + csum_replace4(&iph->check, *oldip, *newip);
> > > + iph->daddr = *newip;
> > > +}
> >
> > Can't we just do the checksum recalculation for this case as it is done
> > with standard GRO?
>
> If I understand standard GRO correctly, it calculates full checksum.
> Should we adopt the same method to UDP GRO fraglist? I did not find
> a simple method for the incremental checksum update.
>
> >
> > > +
> > > +static struct sk_buff *__udpv4_gso_segment_list_csum(struct sk_buff *segs)
> > > +{
> > > + struct sk_buff *seg;
> > > + struct udphdr *uh, *uh2;
> > > + struct iphdr *iph, *iph2;
> > > +
> > > + seg = segs;
> > > + uh = udp_hdr(seg);
> > > + iph = ip_hdr(seg);
> > > +
> > > + while ((seg = seg->next)) {
> > > + uh2 = udp_hdr(seg);
> > > + iph2 = ip_hdr(seg);
> > > +
> > > + if (uh->source != uh2->source || iph->saddr != iph2->saddr)
> > > + __udpv4_gso_segment_csum(seg,
> > > + &iph2->saddr, &iph->saddr,
> > > + &uh2->source, &uh->source);
> > > +
> > > + if (uh->dest != uh2->dest || iph->daddr != iph2->daddr)
> > > + __udpv4_gso_segment_csum(seg,
> > > + &iph2->daddr, &iph->daddr,
> > > + &uh2->dest, &uh->dest);
> > > + }
> >
> > You don't need to check the addresses and ports of all packets in the
> > segment list. If the addresses and ports are equal for the first and
> > second packet in the list, then this also holds for the rest of the
> > packets.
>
> I think we can try this with an additional flag (seg_csum).
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> index 36b7e30..3f892df 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
> @@ -213,25 +213,36 @@ static struct sk_buff *__udpv4_gso_segment_list_csum(struct sk_buff *segs)
> struct sk_buff *seg;
> struct udphdr *uh, *uh2;
> struct iphdr *iph, *iph2;
> + bool seg_csum = false;
>
> seg = segs;
> uh = udp_hdr(seg);
> iph = ip_hdr(seg);
>
> - while ((seg = seg->next)) {
> + seg = seg->next;
> + do {
> + if (!seg)
> + break;
> +
> uh2 = udp_hdr(seg);
> iph2 = ip_hdr(seg);
>
> - if (uh->source != uh2->source || iph->saddr != iph2->saddr)
> + if (uh->source != uh2->source || iph->saddr != iph2->saddr) {
> __udpv4_gso_segment_csum(seg,
> &iph2->saddr, &iph->saddr,
> &uh2->source, &uh->source);
> + seg_csum = true;
> + }
>
> - if (uh->dest != uh2->dest || iph->daddr != iph2->daddr)
> + if (uh->dest != uh2->dest || iph->daddr != iph2->daddr) {
> __udpv4_gso_segment_csum(seg,
> &iph2->daddr, &iph->daddr,
> &uh2->dest, &uh->dest);
> - }
> + seg_csum = true;
> + }
> +
> + seg = seg->next;
> + } while (seg_csum);
>
> return segs;
> }
Hi, Steffen
Do you have any further comments for this? I think the bug fix has
higher priority than optimization. Can we defer the optimization
patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists