[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB276074D0A10866EDA016F9BA88A10@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 01:21:51 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: "ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"o.rempel@...gutronix.de" <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"paul@...pouillou.net" <paul@...pouillou.net>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"agross@...nel.org" <agross@...nel.org>,
"patrice.chotard@...com" <patrice.chotard@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V8 10/10] remoteproc: imx_proc: enable virtio/mailbox
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 10/10] remoteproc: imx_proc: enable virtio/mailbox
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:35:11PM +0800, peng.fan@....com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > Use virtio/mailbox to build connection between Remote Proccessors and
> > Linux. Add work queue to handle incoming messages.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 116
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirer@...aro.org>
>
> I will pickup this set when Rob has reviewed the DT bindings. In the mean
> time you might want to fix the title section in the the .yaml file, the Kconfig
> and the MODULE_DESCRIPTION and add a reference to i.MX8.
Thanks for your reviewing efforts.
I have updated patch 2, 8 in v9 to address the issue you mentioned.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 54ac143ba033..c16a91f8e410
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> > #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > @@ -15,6 +16,9 @@
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > +
> > +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> >
> > #define IMX7D_SRC_SCR 0x0C
> > #define IMX7D_ENABLE_M4 BIT(3)
> > @@ -86,6 +90,11 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> > const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg;
> > struct imx_rproc_mem mem[IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX];
> > struct clk *clk;
> > + struct mbox_client cl;
> > + struct mbox_chan *tx_ch;
> > + struct mbox_chan *rx_ch;
> > + struct work_struct rproc_work;
> > + struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
> > };
> >
> > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mq[] = { @@
> > -366,9 +375,33 @@ static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc,
> const struct firmware *fw)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) {
> > + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > + int err;
> > + __u32 mmsg;
> > +
> > + if (!priv->tx_ch) {
> > + dev_err(priv->dev, "No initialized mbox tx channel\n");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Send the index of the triggered virtqueue as the mu payload.
> > + * Let remote processor know which virtqueue is used.
> > + */
> > + mmsg = vqid << 16;
> > +
> > + err = mbox_send_message(priv->tx_ch, (void *)&mmsg);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + dev_err(priv->dev, "%s: failed (%d, err:%d)\n",
> > + __func__, vqid, err);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> > .start = imx_rproc_start,
> > .stop = imx_rproc_stop,
> > + .kick = imx_rproc_kick,
> > .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
> > .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > .parse_fw = imx_rproc_parse_fw,
> > @@ -444,6 +477,66 @@ static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc
> *priv,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void imx_rproc_vq_work(struct work_struct *work) {
> > + struct imx_rproc *priv = container_of(work, struct imx_rproc,
> > + rproc_work);
> > +
> > + rproc_vq_interrupt(priv->rproc, 0);
> > + rproc_vq_interrupt(priv->rproc, 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void imx_rproc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc = dev_get_drvdata(cl->dev);
> > + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > +
> > + queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->rproc_work); }
> > +
> > +static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc) {
> > + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > + struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > + struct mbox_client *cl;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + cl = &priv->cl;
> > + cl->dev = dev;
> > + cl->tx_block = true;
> > + cl->tx_tout = 100;
> > + cl->knows_txdone = false;
> > + cl->rx_callback = imx_rproc_rx_callback;
> > +
> > + priv->tx_ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, "tx");
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->tx_ch)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->tx_ch);
> > + return dev_err_probe(cl->dev, ret,
> > + "failed to request tx mailbox channel: %d\n", ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rx_ch = mbox_request_channel_byname(cl, "rx");
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rx_ch)) {
> > + mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rx_ch);
> > + return dev_err_probe(cl->dev, ret,
> > + "failed to request rx mailbox channel: %d\n", ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc) {
> > + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> > +
> > + mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch);
> > + mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -481,18 +574,28 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> > priv->dev = dev;
> >
> > dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc);
> > + priv->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
> > + if (!priv->workqueue) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err_put_rproc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_put_wkq;
> >
> > ret = imx_rproc_addr_init(priv, pdev);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed on imx_rproc_addr_init\n");
> > - goto err_put_rproc;
> > + goto err_put_mbox;
> > }
> >
> > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n");
> > ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> > - goto err_put_rproc;
> > + goto err_put_mbox;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -502,9 +605,11 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n");
> > - goto err_put_rproc;
> > + goto err_put_mbox;
> > }
> >
> > + INIT_WORK(&(priv->rproc_work), imx_rproc_vq_work);
> > +
> > ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "rproc_add failed\n"); @@ -515,6 +620,10 @@ static
> int
> > imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > err_put_clk:
> > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> > +err_put_mbox:
> > + imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > +err_put_wkq:
> > + destroy_workqueue(priv->workqueue);
> > err_put_rproc:
> > rproc_free(rproc);
> >
> > @@ -528,6 +637,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
> > rproc_del(rproc);
> > + imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
> > rproc_free(rproc);
> >
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists