[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474055ad-978a-4da5-d7f0-e2dc862b781c@lightnvm.io>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:55:53 +0100
From: Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lightnvm: fix memory leak when submit fails
On 21/01/2021 13.47, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/21/21 12:22 AM, Pan Bian wrote:
>> The allocated page is not released if error occurs in
>> nvm_submit_io_sync_raw(). __free_page() is moved ealier to avoid
>> possible memory leak issue.
> Applied, thanks.
>
> General question for Matias - is lightnvm maintained anymore at all, or
> should we remove it? The project seems dead from my pov, and I don't
> even remember anyone even reviewing fixes from other people.
>
Hi Jens,
ZNS has superseded OCSSD/lightnvm. As a result, the hardware and
software development around OCSSD have also moved on to ZNS. To my
knowledge, there is not anyone implementing OCSSD1.2/2.0 commercially at
this point, and what has been deployed in production does not utilize
the Linux kernel stack.
I do not mind continuing to keep an eye on it, but on the other hand, it
has served its purpose. It enabled the "Open-Channel SSD architectures"
of the world to take hold in the market and thereby gained enough
momentum to be standardized in NVMe as ZNS.
Would you like me to send a PR to remove lightnvm immediately, or should
we mark it as deprecated for a while before pulling it?
Best, Matias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists