[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjft2umlte.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:00:45 +0000
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
cai@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com, decui@...rosoft.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 3/9] sched: Dont run cpu-online with balance_push() enabled
On 21/01/21 11:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -7608,6 +7614,12 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
> }
> rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
>
> + /*
> + * Should really be after we clear cpu_online(), but we're in
> + * stop_machine(), so it all works.
> + */
I believe you noted yourself in some earlier version that this *is* running
with cpu_online(cpu) == false, __cpu_disable() being invoked before the
_DYING .teardown callbacks are run.
> + balance_push_set(cpu, false);
> +
> calc_load_migrate(rq);
> update_max_interval();
> nohz_balance_exit_idle(rq);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists