linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools/nolibc: fix build issues on aarch64 after unistd cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210121141809.GC24174@1wt.eu>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:18:09 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        valentin.schneider@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools/nolibc: fix build issues on aarch64 after
 unistd cleanup

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> So FWIW:
> 
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [arm64]

Perfect, thanks! Paul, may I let you copy-paste the tested-by yourself ?
If you prefer I'm fine with resending a series to you, I just don't want
to needlessly spam you :-)

> It would be great if this could be applied soon so that it's possible to
> use the rcutorture scripts without applying local hacks.

Makes sense. I was wondering, should we mark them for stable ? I don't
know if anyone relies on these tests to validate stable kernels in
fact.

> Willy, thanks for sorting this out, especially so quickly!

You're welcome, and thanks to you for the detailed report and explanations.

Willy