linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:05:23 +0100
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

On 22/01/2021 at 17:35, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 22/01/2021 16:25:47+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>>>
>>> Arnd, Olof,
>>>
>>> I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
>>> didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
>>> missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
>>> predictable during all those years!
>>>
>>> Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
>>> platform kernels.
>>>
>>> I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
>>> that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
>>> linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
>>> mid-next-week.
>>> Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
>>
>> This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
>> into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.
>>
>> I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
>> I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.
>>
> 
> I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a
> configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I
> wouldn't enable this driver on any platform).
> 
> If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/

Arnd, Alexandre,

Whatever you prefer is fine with me. As I'm not the first impacted I 
wouldn't push in one direction or another.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre