[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161133729540.414.15092664862520486982.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:41:35 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/urgent] workqueue: Tag bound workers with KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU
The following commit has been merged into the sched/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5c25b5ff89f004c30b04759dc34ace8585a4085f
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5c25b5ff89f004c30b04759dc34ace8585a4085f
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:26:49 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:09:42 +01:00
workqueue: Tag bound workers with KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU
Mark the per-cpu workqueue workers as KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU.
Workqueues have unfortunate semantics in that per-cpu workers are not
default flushed and parked during hotplug, however a subset does
manual flush on hotplug and hard relies on them for correctness.
Therefore play silly games..
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210121103506.693465814@infradead.org
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 1646331..cce3433 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1861,6 +1861,8 @@ static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
*/
if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
+ else
+ kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, pool->cpu);
list_add_tail(&worker->node, &pool->workers);
worker->pool = pool;
@@ -1883,6 +1885,7 @@ static void worker_detach_from_pool(struct worker *worker)
mutex_lock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
+ kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, -1);
list_del(&worker->node);
worker->pool = NULL;
@@ -4919,8 +4922,10 @@ static void unbind_workers(int cpu)
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
- for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
+ for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
+ kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, -1);
WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpu_possible_mask) < 0);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
@@ -4972,9 +4977,11 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
* of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND. As we're called
* from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
*/
- for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
+ for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
+ kthread_set_per_cpu(worker->task, pool->cpu);
WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
+ }
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists