[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a677f0bb-2d17-f372-66a3-65a74494eb6c@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:17:17 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>, rrichter@....com,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trenn@...e.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] cpupower: Update msr_pstate union struct naming
On 1/22/21 10:38 AM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> The msr_pstate union struct named fam17h_bits is misleading since
> this is the struct to use for all families >= 0x17, not just
> for family 0x17. Rename the bits structs to be 'pstate' (for pre
> family 17h CPUs) and 'pstatedef' (for CPUs since fam 17h) to align
> closer with PPR/BDKG naming.
What is PPR/PDKG - would be helpful to know what it is and provide
link to the doc if applicable.
>
> There are no functional changes as part of this update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>
> ---
> tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c
> index 7c4f83a8c973..34368436bbd6 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/helpers/amd.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
> #define MSR_AMD_PSTATE 0xc0010064
> #define MSR_AMD_PSTATE_LIMIT 0xc0010061
>
> -union msr_pstate {
> +union core_pstate {
> + /* pre fam 17h: */
> struct {
> unsigned fid:6;
> unsigned did:3;
> @@ -26,7 +27,8 @@ union msr_pstate {
> unsigned idddiv:2;
> unsigned res3:21;
> unsigned en:1;
> - } bits;
> + } pstate;
> + /* since fam 17h: */
> struct {
> unsigned fid:8;
> unsigned did:6;
> @@ -35,36 +37,36 @@ union msr_pstate {
> unsigned idddiv:2;
> unsigned res1:31;
> unsigned en:1;
> - } fam17h_bits;
> + } pstatedef;
Does pstatedef indicate this is pstate default?
> unsigned long long val;
> };
>
> -static int get_did(int family, union msr_pstate pstate)
> +static int get_did(int family, union core_pstate pstate)
> {
> int t;
>
> if (family == 0x12)
> t = pstate.val & 0xf;
> else if (family == 0x17 || family == 0x18)
> - t = pstate.fam17h_bits.did;
> + t = pstate.pstatedef.did;
> else
> - t = pstate.bits.did;
> + t = pstate.pstate.did;
>
> return t;
> }
>
> -static int get_cof(int family, union msr_pstate pstate)
> +static int get_cof(int family, union core_pstate pstate)
> {
> int t;
> int fid, did, cof;
>
> did = get_did(family, pstate);
> if (family == 0x17 || family == 0x18) {
> - fid = pstate.fam17h_bits.fid;
> + fid = pstate.pstatedef.fid;
> cof = 200 * fid / did;
> } else {
> t = 0x10;
> - fid = pstate.bits.fid;
> + fid = pstate.pstate.fid;
> if (family == 0x11)
> t = 0x8;
> cof = (100 * (fid + t)) >> did;
> @@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ int decode_pstates(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cpu_family,
> int boost_states, unsigned long *pstates, int *no)
> {
> int i, psmax, pscur;
> - union msr_pstate pstate;
> + union core_pstate pstate;
> unsigned long long val;
>
> /* Only read out frequencies from HW when CPU might be boostable
> @@ -119,9 +121,9 @@ int decode_pstates(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cpu_family,
> }
> if (read_msr(cpu, MSR_AMD_PSTATE + i, &pstate.val))
> return -1;
> - if ((cpu_family == 0x17) && (!pstate.fam17h_bits.en))
> + if ((cpu_family == 0x17) && (!pstate.pstatedef.en))
> continue;
> - else if (!pstate.bits.en)
> + else if (!pstate.pstate.en)
> continue;
>
> pstates[i] = get_cof(cpu_family, pstate);
>
>
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists