lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 20:32:41 +0000
From:   "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@...co.com>
To:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
        "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: boot: dts: add new dts for hellcat & petra

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:48:53AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 1/22/21 12:12 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Add Petra and Hellcat dts file. These platforms are based on
> > the Xilinx Zynqmp platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
> > Cc: xe-linux-external@...co.com
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/Makefile           |   2 +
> >  .../boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-petra-hellcat.dts  | 856 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-petra.dts   | 847 +++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 1705 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-petra-hellcat.dts
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-petra.dts
> 
> First of all I can't see 2/2.
 
It wasn't being submitted to you. But here it is if you care to look at it.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/21/1468

> 
> Long time ago we said that we are not going to push any PL related
> configurations. It means all below can't be merged.
> And there are also coding style issues.

You'll need to explain this more. It's likely this was added at the suggestion of
Xilinx. If it can't be upstreamed what should we replace it with ?

I will review your other comments and re-submit.

Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ