[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210122160052.4b535511@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:00:52 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: axelrasmussen@...gle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] tracing: Rework synthetic event command parsing
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:01:05 -0600
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> @@ -1208,13 +1173,14 @@ static int __create_synth_event(int argc, const char *name, const char **argv)
> * where 'field' = type field_name
> */
>
> - if (name[0] == '\0' || argc < 1) {
> + mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
I'm curious, why is the event_mutex taken here? I'm guessing it is first
needed for the find_synth_event() call, in which case, it can be moved
after the is_good_name() check. I don't see why the goto out is required
here or for the is_good_name() check.
-- Steve
> +
> + if (name[0] == '\0') {
> synth_err(SYNTH_ERR_CMD_INCOMPLETE, 0);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
> -
> if (!is_good_name(name)) {
> synth_err(SYNTH_ERR_BAD_NAME, errpos(name));
> ret = -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists