[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210122043714.266075-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:37:14 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: rppt@...nel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, guro@...com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kernel-team@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, riel@...riel.com,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] memblock: do not start bottom-up allocations with kernel_end
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> writes:
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
I've seen a couple of spurious triggers of the WARN_ONCE() removed by this
patch. This happens on some ppc64le bare metal (powernv) server machines with
CONFIG_SWIOTLB=y and crashkernel=4G, as described in a candidate patch I posted
to solve this issue in a different way:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20201218062103.76102-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com/
Since this patch solves that problem, is it possible to include it in the next
feasible v5.11-rcX, with the following tag?
Fixes: 8fabc623238e ("powerpc: Ensure that swiotlb buffer is allocated from low memory")
This is because reverting the commit above also solves the problem on the
machines where I've seen this issue.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists