[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210122235238.655049-1-elavila@google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 23:52:39 +0000
From: "J. Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Issue in dmesg time with lockless ring buffer
Hello,
When doing some internal testing on a 5.10.4 kernel, we found that the
time taken for dmesg seemed to increase from the order of milliseconds to
the order of seconds when the dmesg size approached the ~1.2MB limit. After
doing some digging, we found that by reverting all of the patches in printk/
up to and including 896fbe20b4e2333fb55cc9b9b783ebcc49eee7c7 ("use the
lockless ringbuffer"), we were able to once more see normal dmesg times.
This kernel had no meaningful diffs in the printk/ dir when compared to
Linus' tree. This behavior was consistently reproducible using the
following steps:
1) In one shell, run "time dmesg > /dev/null"
2) In another, constantly write to /dev/kmsg
Within ~5 minutes, we saw that dmesg times increased to 1 second, only
increasing further from there. Is this a known issue?
Thank you,
Avila
Powered by blists - more mailing lists