[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YApjeinzJWKYNbYb@lx-t490>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 06:32:42 +0100
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.11-rc4-rt1
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:50:08PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I'm pleased to announce the v5.11-rc4-rt1 patch set.
> >
> > Changes since v5.10.8-rt24:
> >
> > - Updated to v5.11-rc4
> >
> > Known issues
> > - kdb/kgdb can easily deadlock.
> > - kmsg dumpers expecting not to be called in parallel can clobber
> > their temp buffer.
> > - netconsole triggers WARN.
>
> I noticed... lot of code using in_interrupt() to decide what to do is
> making it to 5.10-stable at the moment (and I guess that means
> vanilla, too).
>
> I have recollection that that is not okay thing to do. Am I right?
>
Correct. These macros should not be added to new, non-core, kernel code.
There's an on-going effort to clear them already, as in:
- https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201019100629.419020859@linutronix.de (merged)
- https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201126132952.2287996-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de (merged)
- https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210118100955.1761652-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de (to be merged)
> Examples: 8abec36d1274bbd5ae8f36f3658b9abb3db56c31,
> d68b29584c25dbacd01ed44a3e45abb35353f1de.
>
That's sad.
Maybe it would be wise to let a bot scan lore regularly, and send an
automatic notification to authors whenever their patches reintroduce
these macros to non-core kernel code.
Thanks,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists