linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in ARM/RISCV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d911b1e6-ed0d-4a73-aee4-060b957897f8@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:29:43 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>, Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] initrd: Use unified initrd reserve function in
 ARM/RISCV


On 2021/1/18 17:17, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:01:40AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2021/1/17 18:09, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:57:55PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>>>> Correct Russell's mail address (from linux@...linux.org.uk to
>>>> rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, should update the MAINTAINERS)
>>> No. MAINTAINERS is correct.
>> I got following message,  so I check mail of your recent patches, and send a
>> new one.
>>
>> Please ignore it, there may be some other problems.
>>
>> "*Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:*
>>
>> linux@...linux.org.uk <mailto:linux@...linux.org.uk>
>> A communication failure occurred during the delivery of this message. Please
>> to resend the message later. If the problem continues, contact your
>> helpdesk."
> That is a most unhelpful bounce message - I suppose it's designed for
> non-technical people to ensure that the problem can't be resolved.
>
> >From what I can see from my end, every attempt involving your email
> address last week (wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com) has been successful, so
> I suspect the problem is not at my end.

ok，thank you for letting me know that the email has been received,

any comment about the ARM part in the patchset  ;)

>
> In any case, all @armlinux.org.uk addresses hit the same server, so
> if there's a "communication failure" for the domain, it would affect
> all local-parts equally.
>