[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f05a1ee-fcfa-4abb-74f3-d47b64378a4a@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:08:05 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix prototype warning from kernel test robot
On 22.01.21 09:58, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/22/21 at 09:55am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 22.01.21 09:46, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> On 01/22/21 at 09:40am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 22.01.21 08:03, Baoquan He wrote:
>>>>> Kernel test robot calling make with 'W=1' triggering warning like below
>>>>> below for memmap_init_zone() function.
>>>>>
>>>>> mm/page_alloc.c:6259:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'memmap_init_zone' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>>>>> 6259 | void __meminit __weak memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid,
>>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix it by adding the function declaration in include/linux/mm.h.
>>>>> Since memmap_init_zone() has a generic version with '__weak',
>>>>> the declaratoin in ia64 header file can be simply removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 -----
>>>>> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> index 2c81394a2430..9b4efe89e62d 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>>>>> @@ -517,11 +517,6 @@ extern struct page *zero_page_memmap_ptr;
>>>>> __changed; \
>>>>> })
>>>>> #endif
>>>>> -
>>>>> -# ifdef CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP
>>>>> - /* arch mem_map init routine is needed due to holes in a virtual mem_map */
>>>>> - extern void memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone);
>>>>> -# endif /* CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP */
>>>>> # endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>>>>> index 56bb239f9150..073049bd0b29 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>>>>> @@ -2401,6 +2401,7 @@ extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve);
>>>>> extern void memmap_init_range(unsigned long, int, unsigned long,
>>>>> unsigned long, unsigned long, enum meminit_context,
>>>>> struct vmem_altmap *, int migratetype);
>>>>> +extern void memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone);
>>>>> extern void setup_per_zone_wmarks(void);
>>>>> extern int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void);
>>>>> extern void mem_init(void);
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This patch is on top of your other series, no?
>>>>
>>>> In -next, we have
>>>>
>>>> extern void memmap_init_zone(unsigned long, int, unsigned long, ...
>>>>
>>>> In that file, so something is wrong.
>>>
>>> Right, this one is based on the memmap_init_xx clean up patchset. I
>>> mentioned this the the sub-thread of kernel test robot reporting issues.
>>>
>>
>> I think it would make things easier to move that fix to the front and
>> resend the whole (5 patches) series.
>
> OK, it's fine to me, will resend a series adding this one in. I also
> need polish log of this patch. Thanks for looking into this.
>
I'll review ASAP once you resend :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists