[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210122094810.6o32gzoqtwgqi5hn@maple.lan>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:48:10 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, jason.wessel@...driver.com,
dianders@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: Make memory allocations more robust
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:08:31PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Currently kdb uses in_interrupt() to determine whether it's library
> code has been called from the kgdb trap handler or from a saner calling
> context such as driver init. This approach is broken because
> in_interrupt() alone isn't able to determine kgdb trap handler entry via
> normal task context such as [1].
>
> We can improve this by adding check for in_dbg_master() which explicitly
> determines if we are running in debugger context. Also, use in_atomic()
> instead of in_interrupt() as the former is more appropriate to know atomic
> context and moreover the later one is deprecated.
Why do we need the in_atomic() here? Or put another way, why isn't
in_dbg_master() sufficient?
Daniel.
>
> [1] $ echo g > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h
> index 7a4a181..7a9ebd9 100644
> --- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h
> +++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ extern struct task_struct *kdb_curr_task(int);
>
> #define kdb_task_has_cpu(p) (task_curr(p))
>
> -#define GFP_KDB (in_interrupt() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL)
> +#define GFP_KDB (in_atomic() || in_dbg_master() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL)
>
> extern void *debug_kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
> extern void debug_kfree(void *);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists