| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210122112816.00004c75@Huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:28:16 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
Chris Browy <cbrowy@...ry-design.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
<daniel.lll@...baba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/mem: Create concept of enabled
commands
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:40:41 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com> wrote:
> On 21-01-14 17:25:31, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:51:18 -0800
> > Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > > CXL devices must implement the Device Command Interface (described in
> > > 8.2.9 of the CXL 2.0 spec). While the driver already maintains a list of
> > > commands it supports, there is still a need to be able to distinguish
> > > between commands that the driver knows about from commands that may not
> > > be supported by the hardware. No such commands currently are defined in
> > > the driver.
> > >
> > > The implementation leaves the statically defined table of commands and
> > > supplements it with a bitmap to determine commands that are enabled.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > There are multiple approaches that can be taken, but this is nice for a
> > > few reasons.
> > >
> > > Here are some of the other solutions:
> > >
> > > Create a per instance table with only the supported commands.
> > > 1. Having a fixed command id -> command mapping is much easier to manage
> > > for development and debugging.
> > > 2. Dealing with dynamic memory allocation for the table adds unnecessary
> > > complexity.
> > > 3. Most tables for device types are likely to be quite similar.
> > > 4. Makes it difficult to implement helper macros like cxl_for_each_cmd()
> > >
> > > If the per instance table did preserve ids, #1 above can be addressed.
> > > However, as "enable" is currently the only mutable state for the
> > > commands, it would yield a lot of overhead for not much gain.
> > > Additionally, the other issues remain.
> > >
> > > If "enable" remains the only mutable state, I believe this to be the
> > > best solution. Once the number of mutable elements in a command grows,
> > > it probably makes sense to move to per device instance state with a
> > > fixed command ID mapping.
> > Agreed with the logic.
> >
> > However, patch wise, should either drop the --- above or move this below the
> > --- after your sign off. Otherwise you run the risk of git dropping your
> > sign off and resulting complaints from anyone run validation scripts
> > of the kernel tree that check for that.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 4 ++++
> > > drivers/cxl/mem.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > > index 537ac4d8e6bd..963ba30cb200 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> > >
> > > #define CXL_GET_FIELD(word, field) FIELD_GET(field##_MASK, word)
> > >
> > > +/* XXX: Arbitrary max */
> > > +#define CXL_MAX_COMMANDS 32
> >
> > If going this way, probably want a build time check that you don't
> > go beyond this value for a given command set. I haven't actually
> > thought about how to construct that but should be easy enough.
> >
>
> I think BUILD_BUG_ON of ARRAY_SIZE mem_commands is sufficient. Let me know if
> you want anything more.
That is fine.
>
> > > +
> > > /* Device (CXL 2.0 - 8.2.8.3) */
> > > #define CXLDEV_CAP_ARRAY_REG 0x0
> > > #define CXLDEV_CAP_ARRAY_CAP_ID 0
> > > @@ -88,6 +91,7 @@ struct cxl_mem {
> > > } ram;
> > >
> > > char firmware_version[0x10];
> > > + DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled_cmds, CXL_MAX_COMMANDS);
> > >
> > > /* Cap 0001h - CXL_CAP_CAP_ID_DEVICE_STATUS */
> > > struct {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> > > index a824cfd4342a..20b26fa2c466 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> > > @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ static struct {
> > > * would typically be used for deprecated commands.
> > > * * %CXL_CMD_FLAG_MANDATORY: Hardware must support this command. This flag is
> > > * only used internally by the driver for sanity checking.
> > > + * * %CXL_CMD_INTERNAL_FLAG_PSEUDO: This is a pseudo command which doesn't have
> > > + * a direct mapping to hardware. They are implicitly always enabled.
> > > *
> > > * The cxl_mem_command is the driver's internal representation of commands that
> > > * are supported by the driver. Some of these commands may not be supported by
> > > @@ -129,6 +131,7 @@ struct cxl_mem_command {
> > > #define CXL_CMD_INTERNAL_FLAG_NONE 0
> > > #define CXL_CMD_INTERNAL_FLAG_HIDDEN BIT(0)
> > > #define CXL_CMD_INTERNAL_FLAG_MANDATORY BIT(1)
> > > +#define CXL_CMD_INTERNAL_FLAG_PSEUDO BIT(2)
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -140,7 +143,7 @@ struct cxl_mem_command {
> > > static struct cxl_mem_command mem_commands[] = {
> > > CXL_CMD(INVALID, KERNEL, 0, 0, HIDDEN),
> > > CXL_CMD(IDENTIFY, NONE, 0, 0x43, MANDATORY),
> > > - CXL_CMD(RAW, NONE, ~0, ~0, MANDATORY),
> > > + CXL_CMD(RAW, NONE, ~0, ~0, PSEUDO),
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define cxl_for_each_cmd(cmd) \
> > > @@ -618,6 +621,10 @@ static int cxl_validate_cmd_from_user(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
> > > c = &mem_commands[send_cmd->id];
> > > info = &c->info;
> > >
> > > + /* Check that the command is enabled for hardware */
> > > + if (!test_bit(cxl_cmd_index(c), cxlm->enabled_cmds))
> > > + return -ENOTTY;
> > > +
> > > if (info->flags & CXL_MEM_COMMAND_FLAG_KERNEL)
> > > return -EPERM;
> > >
> > > @@ -1029,6 +1036,31 @@ static int cxl_mem_add_memdev(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * cxl_mem_enumerate_cmds() - Enumerate commands for a device.
> > > + * @cxlm: The device.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns 0 if enumerate completed successfully.
> > > + *
> > > + * CXL devices have optional support for certain commands. This function will
> > > + * determine the set of supported commands for the hardware and update the
> > > + * enabled_cmds bitmap in the @cxlm.
> > > + */
> > > +static int cxl_mem_enumerate_cmds(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cxl_mem_command *c;
> > > +
> > > + /* All commands are considered enabled for now (except INVALID). */
> > > + cxl_for_each_cmd(c) {
> > > + if (c->flags & CXL_CMD_INTERNAL_FLAG_HIDDEN)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + set_bit(cxl_cmd_index(c), cxlm->enabled_cmds);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * cxl_mem_identify() - Send the IDENTIFY command to the device.
> > > * @cxlm: The device to identify.
> > > @@ -1147,6 +1179,10 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > if (rc)
> > > goto err;
> > >
> > > + rc = cxl_mem_enumerate_cmds(cxlm);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + return rc;
> > > +
> > > rc = cxl_mem_identify(cxlm);
> > > if (rc)
> > > goto err;
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists