linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable stacktrace and minor cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:59:09 +0100 (CET)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Documentation: livepatch: Document reliable
 stacktrace and minor cleanup

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021, Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> > This series adds a document, mainly written by Mark Rutland, which 
> > makes explicit the requirements for implementing reliable stacktrace 
> > in order to aid architectures adding this feature.  It also updates 
> > the other livepatching documents to use automatically generated tables 
> > of contents following review comments on Mark's document.
> 
> So...is this deemed ready and, if so, do you want it to go through the
> docs tree or via some other path?

I am planning to take it through livepatching tree unless there are any 
additional last-minutes comments.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs