[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210122104930.GA8146@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:49:30 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Make definitions of MIPSInst_FMA_{FUNC,FMTM}
consistent with MIPS64 manual
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:53:18PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> The kernel definitions of MIPSInst_FMA_FUNC and MIPSInst_FMA_FFMT are not
> consistent with MADD.fmt, NMADD.fmt and NMSUB.fmt in the MIPS64 manual [1],
> the field func is bit 5..3 and fmt is bit 2..0, fix them. Otherwise there
> exists error when add new instruction simulation.
>
> [1] https://www.mips.com/?do-download=the-mips64-instruction-set-v6-06
>
> Reported-by: Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/inst.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists