[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKjpMkMyzydpchWdbSRSo9vnvKRu5hg+Uc9Hm9hwB4VPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:16:46 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drivers: soc: atmel: add spdx licence identifier
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:21 AM Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> Add SPDX-Licence-Identifier.
License
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 1 +
> drivers/soc/atmel/soc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> index 728d461ad6d6..1a6cb4bc7d67 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
Kernel sources are generally GPL-2.0-only and that was the default.
The commit should note the relicensing and why that is okay (if it
is).
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists