linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf arm-spe: Enable sample type PERF_SAMPLE_DATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 22:30:52 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Al Grant <al.grant@....com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>,
        Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf arm-spe: Enable sample type PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC

Hi Arnaldo,

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:51:57AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:46:51PM +0200, James Clark escreveu:
> > From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > 
> > This patch is to enable sample type PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC for Arm SPE in
> > the perf data, when output the tracing data, it tells tools that it
> > contains data source in the memory event.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> 
> I see two Signed-off-by, ok, any Reviewed-by?

I had no confidence for some changes in the patch series, since James
is more easier to reach out hardware persons, so James kindly took over
and refined the patches (Thanks a lot!).

I hope Al could take a look for the patches, and myself also will give
a review and test for this series.

P.s. @James, I think some patches have been refactored, so it's good
to add "Co-developed-by:" tag or changing the author name for you.
Will comment on this when I review patches.

Thanks,
Leo