linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <715938cd-d898-5d12-cc11-d79cf27c5430@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:14:32 +0100
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
CC:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

On 22/01/2021 at 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Arnd, Olof,
>>
>> I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
>> didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
>> missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
>> predictable during all those years!
>>
>> Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
>> platform kernels.
>>
>> I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
>> that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
>> linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
>> mid-next-week.
>> Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
> 
> This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
> into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.
> 
> I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
> I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.

Oh yes, that'd be good, indeed.

You can add the following tag:
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #4.12+

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre