linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/33] 4.9.253-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYv7HgGcwKmGiGc56NQzG+ZuEV8J_YKL3J8=vgFz32nmiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:51:30 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, pavel@...x.de,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/33] 4.9.253-rc2 review

On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 12:27, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.253 release.
> > There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 16:08:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.253-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

>
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> kernel: 4.9.253-rc2
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.9.y
> git commit: a4108af7f0fa9a58f591ef0bdc78216746dacbd5
> git describe: v4.9.252-34-ga4108af7f0fa
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.252-34-ga4108af7f0fa
>
> No regressions (compared to build v4.9.252-36-g2d7bd2c1841b)
>
> No fixes (compared to build v4.9.252-36-g2d7bd2c1841b)
>
> Ran 39925 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
>
> Environments
> --------------
> - dragonboard-410c - arm64
> - hi6220-hikey - arm64
> - i386
> - juno-r2 - arm64
> - juno-r2-compat
> - juno-r2-kasan
> - qemu-arm64-kasan
> - qemu-x86_64-kasan
> - qemu_arm
> - qemu_arm64
> - qemu_arm64-compat
> - qemu_i386
> - qemu_x86_64
> - qemu_x86_64-compat
> - x15 - arm
> - x86_64
> - x86-kasan
>
> Test Suites
> -----------
> * build
> * linux-log-parser
> * ltp-commands-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-mm-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * fwts
> * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> * libhugetlbfs
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-controllers-tests
> * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> * ltp-crypto-tests
> * ltp-cve-tests
> * ltp-dio-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-tracing-tests
> * network-basic-tests
> * perf
> * v4l2-compliance
> * ltp-open-posix-tests
> * kvm-unit-tests
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org