[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB263252B1BD73A38DD8C0AF4EFFBF0@BYAPR11MB2632.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:31:30 +0000
From: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: 回复: [PATCH 3/3] kvfree_rcu: use migrate_disable/enable()
>________________________________________
>发件人: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
>发送时间: 2021年1月21日 0:21
>收件人: LKML; RCU; Paul E . McKenney; Michael Ellerman
>抄送: Andrew Morton; Daniel Axtens; Frederic Weisbecker; Neeraj >Upadhyay; Joel Fernandes; Peter Zijlstra; Michal Hocko; Thomas >Gleixner; Theodore Y . Ts'o; Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; Uladzislau >Rezki; Oleksiy Avramchenko
>主题: [PATCH 3/3] kvfree_rcu: use migrate_disable/enable()
>
>Since the page is obtained in a fully preemptible context, dropping
>the lock can lead to migration onto another CPU. As a result a prev.
>bnode of that CPU may be underutilised, because a decision has been
>made for a CPU that was run out of free slots to store a pointer.
>
>migrate_disable/enable() are now independent of RT, use it in order
>to prevent any migration during a page request for a specific CPU it
>is requested for.
Hello Rezki
The critical migrate_disable/enable() area is not allowed to block, under RT and non RT.
There is such a description in preempt.h
* Notes on the implementation.
*
* The implementation is particularly tricky since existing code patterns
* dictate neither migrate_disable() nor migrate_enable() is allowed to block.
* This means that it cannot use cpus_read_lock() to serialize against hotplug,
* nor can it easily migrate itself into a pending affinity mask change on
* migrate_enable().
How about the following changes:
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index e7a226abff0d..2aa19537ac7c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3488,12 +3488,10 @@ add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock(struct kfree_rcu_cpu **krcp,
(*krcp)->bkvhead[idx]->nr_records == KVFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR) {
bnode = get_cached_bnode(*krcp);
if (!bnode && can_alloc) {
- migrate_disable();
krc_this_cpu_unlock(*krcp, *flags);
bnode = (struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *)
__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
- *krcp = krc_this_cpu_lock(flags);
- migrate_enable();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&(*krcp)->lock, *flags);
}
if (!bnode)
Thanks
Qiang
>
>Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
>---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 ++
>1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>index 454809514c91..cad36074366d 100644
>--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
>@@ -3489,10 +3489,12 @@ add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock(struct >kfree_rcu_cpu **krcp,
> (*krcp)->bkvhead[idx]->nr_records == >KVFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR) {
> bnode = get_cached_bnode(*krcp);
> if (!bnode && can_alloc) {
>+ migrate_disable();
> krc_this_cpu_unlock(*krcp, *flags);
> bnode = (struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *)
> __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | >__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> *krcp = krc_this_cpu_lock(flags);
>+ migrate_enable();
> }
>
> if (!bnode)
>--
>2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists