lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5959315a-507a-00df-031a-e60d45c1f7ab@linux.com>
Date:   Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:49:57 +0300
From:   Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] trace: Fix race in trace_open and buffer resize call



On 1/22/21 5:37 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:29 +0530
> Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> 
>>>> That could possibly work.  
>>
>> Yes, this will work, As i have tested similar patch for internal testing 
>> for kernel branches like 5.4/4.19.
> 
> Can you or Denis send a proper patch for Greg to backport? I'll review it,
> test it and give my ack to it, so Greg can take it without issue.
> 

I can prepare the patch, but it will be compile-tested only from my side. Honestly,
I think it's better when the patch and its backports have the same author and
commit message. And I can't test the fix by myself as I don't know how to reproduce
conditions for the bug. I think it's better if Gaurav will prepare this backport,
unless he have reasons for me to do it or maybe just don't have enough time nowadays.
Gaurav, if you want to somehow mention me you add my Reported-by:

Thanks,
Denis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ