lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 23 Jan 2021 22:12:50 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:     Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS too low!

On 2021/01/23 20:26, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Should not the first 8192 from "grep lock-classes /proc/lockdep_stats" decrease
> after time (it does not), or once it has failed, it is permanent?

Since lockdep_unregister_key() becomes a no-op because graph_lock() returns 0
due to debug_locks being changed from 1 to 0 by __debug_locks_off() from
debug_locks_off() from debug_locks_off_graph_unlock(), lock-classes value in
/proc/lockdep_stats will not decrease after "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS too low!"
is printed.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ