[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210123211400.GA6270@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:14:00 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@...com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/4] net: mvpp2: Remove unneeded Kconfig dependency.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:12:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I see. The only thing I'm worried about then is the churn in patch 3.
> This would land in Linus's tree shortly before rc6, kinda late to be
> taking chances in the name of minor optimizations :S
;^)
Yeah, by all means, avoid ARM churn... I remember Bad Things there...
Maybe you could take #1 and #2 for net-next?
I should probably submit 3-4 throught the SoC tree anyhow.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists