[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d8e9d63-1fe9-af08-dae9-edd80083e940@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:09:31 -0600
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: SVM: Sync GPRs to the GHCB only after VMGEXIT
On 1/22/21 5:50 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Sync GPRs to the GHCB on VMRUN only if a sync is needed, i.e. if the
> previous exit was a VMGEXIT and the guest is expecting some data back.
>
The start of sev_es_sync_to_ghcb() checks if the GHCB has been mapped,
which only occurs on VMGEXIT, and exits early if not. And
sev_es_sync_from_ghcb() is only called if the GHCB has been successfully
mapped. The only thing in between is sev_es_validate_vmgexit(), which will
terminate the VM on error. So I don't think this patch is needed.
Thanks,
Tom
> Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index ac652bc476ae..9bd1e1650eb3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -1418,10 +1418,13 @@ static void sev_es_sync_to_ghcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> * Copy their values, even if they may not have been written during the
> * VM-Exit. It's the guest's responsibility to not consume random data.
> */
> - ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
> - ghcb_set_rbx(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX]);
> - ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX]);
> - ghcb_set_rdx(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX]);
> + if (svm->need_sync_to_ghcb) {
> + ghcb_set_rax(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX]);
> + ghcb_set_rbx(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX]);
> + ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX]);
> + ghcb_set_rdx(ghcb, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX]);
> + svm->need_sync_to_ghcb = false;
> + }
> }
>
> static void sev_es_sync_from_ghcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> @@ -1441,8 +1444,10 @@ static void sev_es_sync_from_ghcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> * VMMCALL allows the guest to provide extra registers. KVM also
> * expects RSI for hypercalls, so include that, too.
> *
> - * Copy their values to the appropriate location if supplied.
> + * Copy their values to the appropriate location if supplied, and
> + * flag that a sync back to the GHCB is needed on the next VMRUN.
> */
> + svm->need_sync_to_ghcb = true;
> memset(vcpu->arch.regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.regs));
>
> vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] = ghcb_get_rax_if_valid(ghcb);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> index 0fe874ae5498..4e2e5f9fbfc2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
> u64 ghcb_sa_len;
> bool ghcb_sa_sync;
> bool ghcb_sa_free;
> + bool need_sync_to_ghcb;
> };
>
> struct svm_cpu_data {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists