linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 5/6] of: unittest: Create overlay_common.dtsi and testcases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210123030709.GI4400@yekko.fritz.box>
Date:   Sat, 23 Jan 2021 14:07:09 +1100
From:   David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anmar.oueja@...aro.org,
        Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 5/6] of: unittest: Create overlay_common.dtsi and
 testcases_common.dtsi

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 04:20:35PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> In order to build-test the same unit-test files using fdtoverlay tool,
> move the device nodes from the existing overlay_base.dts and
> testcases_common.dts files to .dtsi files. The .dts files now include
> the new .dtsi files, resulting in exactly the same behavior as earlier.
> 
> The .dtsi files can now be reused for compile time tests using
> fdtoverlay (will be done in a later patch).
> 
> This is required because the base files passed to fdtoverlay tool
> shouldn't be overlays themselves (i.e. shouldn't have the /plugin/;
> tag).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts     | 90 +-----------------
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_common.dtsi  | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts        | 17 +---
>  .../of/unittest-data/testcases_common.dtsi    | 18 ++++
>  4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_common.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases_common.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts
> index 99ab9d12d00b..ab9014589c5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts
> @@ -2,92 +2,4 @@
>  /dts-v1/;
>  /plugin/;

This still makes no sense to me.  Is this data intended as a base
tree, or as an overlay?  If it's an overlay, what are the constraints
on the base tree it's supposed to apply to.

This patch is treating it as both in different places, but that's such
a bizarre usecase it needs detailed justification.  It really looks
like the unittest stuff is doing some very bogus stuff that should be
fixed first, before trying to do this on top.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)