linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: Fix an error handling path in 'ebu_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzFDPBGY1uoB7vqJreOSfs9N2PGMDTbQ24PYBWBRVR4oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:14:32 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: Fix an error handling path in 'ebu_dma_start()'

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 9:13 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> > If 'dmaengine_prep_slave_single()' fails, we must undo a previous
> > 'dma_map_single()' call, as already done in all the other error handling
> > paths of this function.
>
> Would you ever like to use an imperative wording for the change description?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=fdbc80bdc4365078a0f7d65631171cb80e3ffd6e#n89
>
>
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/intel-nand-controller.c
> > @@ -318,8 +318,10 @@ static int ebu_dma_start(struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host, u32 dir,
> >       }
> >
> >       tx = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(chan, buf_dma, len, dir, flags);
> > -     if (!tx)
> > -             return -ENXIO;
> > +     if (!tx) {
> > +             ret = -ENXIO;
> > +             goto err_unmap;
> > +     }
> >
> >       tx->callback = callback;
> …
>
> By the way:
> Can it be nicer to achieve the statement “ret = -EIO;” by a jump for
> a target like “e_io” so that less exception handling code would be duplicated
> for this function implementation?

Please feel free to ignore Markus.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/X+x3pIanr18Ep4ga@kroah.com/

-- 
Thanks,
//richard