linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] ASoC: arizona-jack: Cleanup logging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5aefbd9b-6e98-6cd7-bb98-80df88109a40@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jan 2021 22:13:13 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] ASoC: arizona-jack: Cleanup logging

Hi,

On 1/24/21 8:53 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:17 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Cleanup the use of dev_foo functions used for logging:
>>
>> 1. Many of these are unnecessarily split over multiple lines
>> 2. Use dev_err_probe() in cases where we might get a -EPROBE_DEFER
>>    return value
> 
> ...
> 
>>                 if (IS_ERR(info->micd_pol_gpio)) {
>>                         ret = PTR_ERR(info->micd_pol_gpio);
>> -                       dev_err(arizona->dev,
>> -                               "Failed to get microphone polarity GPIO: %d\n",
>> -                               ret);
>> +                       dev_err_probe(arizona->dev, ret, "getting microphone polarity GPIO\n");
>>                         return ret;
>>                 }
> 
> I still think that using dev_err_probe() naturally, i.e. as a part of
> the return statement is better.

Just because it can be used that way does not mean that it must be used that way.

More importantly I don't think that this small tihng is worth doing a v5 of
this large series for. But if a v5 is necessary for other reasons,
then I'll change this into:

 return dev_err_probe(arizona->dev, ret, "getting microphone polarity GPIO\n");

Regards,

Hans