[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb4n5g6vtZ7sHyPXGJXDYAm=kPPrc9TE6+zjCPB+aQsgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:19:55 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dsa: vsc73xx: add support for vlan filtering
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:45 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:30:18AM +0100, Pawel Dembicki wrote:
> > This patch adds support for vlan filtering in vsc73xx driver.
> >
> > After vlan filtering enable, CPU_PORT is configured as trunk, without
> > non-tagged frames. This allows to avoid problems with transmit untagged
> > frames because vsc73xx is DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Dembicki <paweldembicki@...il.com>
>
> What are the issues that are preventing you from getting rid of
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE? Not saying that making the driver VLAN aware is a
> bad idea, but maybe also adding a tagging driver should really be the
> path going forward.
This is due to the internal architecture of the switch, while it does
have an internal tagging format, this is stripped off before letting
it exit through the CPU port, and tagged on by the hardware
whenever the CPU transmits something. So these tags are
invisible to the CPU.
Itr would be neat if there was some bit in the switch we could
flick and then the internal tagging format would come out on
the CPU port, but sadly this does not exist.
The vendors idea is that the switch should be programmed
internally as it contains an 8051 processor that can indeed see
the internal tags. This makes a lot of sense when the chips are
used for a hardware switch, i.e. a box with several ethernet ports
on it. Sadly it is not very well adopted for the usecase of smart
operating system like linux hogging into the CPU port and
using it as a managed switch. :/
We currently have the 8051 processor in the switch disabled.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists