[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210125173120.28b94105@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:31:20 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the integrity tree
Hi all,
FIXME: Add owner of second tree to To:
Add author(s)/SOB of conflicting commits.
Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got a conflict in:
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
between commits:
2b4a2474a202 ("IMA: generalize keyring specific measurement constructs")
291af651b350 ("IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash")
d6e645012d97 ("IMA: define a hook to measure kernel integrity critical data")
9f5d7d23cc5e ("IMA: extend critical data hook to limit the measurement based on a label")
from the integrity tree and commit:
a2d2329e30e2 ("ima: handle idmapped mounts")
from the pidfd tree.
At this point, the whole thing just got too hard, so I dropped the
pidfd tree for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists