linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] ubifs: Update directory size when creating whiteouts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyHL5AMWcfLQg2fS6Nbp255yjve5nJ83ELYHnPhKp6Wxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 08:55:34 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ubifs: Update directory size when creating whiteouts

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:12 AM Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> 在 2021/1/23 10:45, Zhihao Cheng 写道:
>
> >> @@ -430,6 +433,7 @@ static int do_tmpfile(struct inode *dir, struct
> >> dentry *dentry,
> >>       return 0;
> >>   out_cancel:
> Still one question:
> > Does this need a judgment? Like this,

The idea was that in the !whiteout case, sz_change is always 0.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard