[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <97d1f36a3b534b7fbd3790a0277ccaf5@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:37:36 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Candle Sun' <candlesea@...il.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"natechancellor@...il.com" <natechancellor@...il.com>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"candle.sun@...soc.com" <candle.sun@...soc.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] lkdtm: fix memory copy size for WRITE_KERN
From: Candle Sun
> Sent: 25 January 2021 08:56
>
> From: Candle Sun <candle.sun@...soc.com>
>
> Though do_overwritten() follows do_nothing() in source code, the final
> memory address order is determined by compiler. We can't always assume
> address of do_overwritten() is bigger than do_nothing(). At least the
> Clang we are using places do_overwritten() before do_nothing() in the
> object. This causes the copy size in lkdtm_WRITE_KERN() is *really*
> big and WRITE_KERN test on ARM32 arch will fail.
>
> Compare the address order before doing the subtraction.
It isn't clear that helps.
Compile with -ffunction-sections and/or do LTO an there
is no reason at all why the functions should be together.
Even without that lkdtm_WRITE_KERN() could easily be between them.
You need to get the size of the 'empty function' from the
symbol table.
David
>
> Signed-off-by: Candle Sun <candle.sun@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c
> index 2dede2ef658f..fbfbdf89d668 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c
> @@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ static unsigned long ro_after_init __ro_after_init = 0x55AA5500;
> * This just returns to the caller. It is designed to be copied into
> * non-executable memory regions.
> */
> -static void do_nothing(void)
> +static noinline void do_nothing(void)
> {
> return;
> }
>
> /* Must immediately follow do_nothing for size calculuations to work out. */
> -static void do_overwritten(void)
> +static noinline void do_overwritten(void)
> {
> pr_info("do_overwritten wasn't overwritten!\n");
> return;
> @@ -110,15 +110,14 @@ void lkdtm_WRITE_RO_AFTER_INIT(void)
>
> void lkdtm_WRITE_KERN(void)
> {
> - size_t size;
> - volatile unsigned char *ptr;
> + unsigned long value_dow = (unsigned long)do_overwritten;
> + unsigned long value_do = (unsigned long)do_nothing;
> + size_t size = (size_t)(value_dow > value_do ?
> + value_dow - value_do : value_do - value_dow);
>
> - size = (unsigned long)do_overwritten - (unsigned long)do_nothing;
> - ptr = (unsigned char *)do_overwritten;
> -
> - pr_info("attempting bad %zu byte write at %px\n", size, ptr);
> - memcpy((void *)ptr, (unsigned char *)do_nothing, size);
> - flush_icache_range((unsigned long)ptr, (unsigned long)(ptr + size));
> + pr_info("attempting bad %zu byte write at %px\n", size, do_overwritten);
> + memcpy((void *)value_dow, (void *)value_do, size);
> + flush_icache_range(value_dow, value_dow + (unsigned long)size);
> pr_err("FAIL: survived bad write\n");
>
> do_overwritten();
> --
> 2.17.0
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists