linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C and Ubiquiti U-Fiber

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:47:03 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Schreiber <tschreibe@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] net: sfp: add support for GPON RTL8672/RTL9601C
 and Ubiquiti U-Fiber

On Monday 25 January 2021 14:42:21 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 25 January 2021 14:16:44 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 03:09:57PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Monday 18 January 2021 10:34:35 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Monday 11 January 2021 12:39:07 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > This is a third version of patches which add workarounds for
> > > > > > RTL8672/RTL9601C EEPROMs and Ubiquiti U-Fiber Instant SFP.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Russel's PATCH v2 2/3 was dropped from this patch series as
> > > > > > it is being handled separately.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Andrew and Russel, are you fine with this third iteration of patches?
> > > > > Or are there still some issues which needs to be fixed?
> > > > 
> > > > PING!
> > > 
> > > What about the commit message suggestions from Marek?
> > 
> > I have already wrote that I'm fine with those suggestions.
> > 
> > It is the only thing to handle? If yes, should I send a new patch series
> > with fixed commit messages?
> 
> Yes, because that's the way the netdev list works - patches sent to
> netdev go into patchwork, when they get reviewed and acks etc,
> patchwork updates itself. Jakub or David can then see what the status
> is and apply them to the net or net-next trees as appropriate.

Ok! If this is the only remaining issue, I will update commit messages
and send a new patch series. I was just waiting for a response if
somebody else has other comments or if somebody write that is fine with
it.

> The "finished" patches need to be posted for this process to start.
> 
> Thanks.