[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYv89bfbixjuudPWkBAucTYg7qhNxcV54RMEkRP5is-bnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:01:48 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
chrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
Joerg.Vehlow@...-tech.de
Subject: Re: LTP: madvise08.c:203: TFAIL: No sequence in dump after MADV_DODUMP.
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 20:41, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:48 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > LTP syscalls madvise08 test case failed on all devices from
> > Linux next 20210118 to till day.
> > strace log attached to this email and link provided below.
> >
> > BAD: next-20210118
> > GOOD: next-20210115
> >
> > This failure is easily reproducible on Linux next tag 20210118 above.
> >
> > tst_test.c:1250: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s
> > madvise08.c:73: TINFO: Temporary core pattern is
> > '/scratch/ltp-2nftQzNI1K/HclFMH/dump-%p'
> > madvise08.c:112: TINFO: Dump file should be dump-10109
> > madvise08.c:196: TPASS: madvise(..., MADV_DONTDUMP)
> > madvise08.c:112: TINFO: Dump file should be dump-10110
> > madvise08.c:203: TFAIL: No sequence in dump after MADV_DODUMP.
> >
> > strace log,
> > https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2184866#L1257
>
> Ok, so in this part of the log,
>
> [pid 485] --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_DUMPED,
> si_pid=487, si_uid=0, si_status=SIGABRT, si_utime=0, si_stime=0} ---
> [pid 485] write(2, \"madvise08.c:117: \33[1;34mTINFO: \33\"...,
> 64madvise08.c:117: [1;34mTINFO: [0mDump file should be dump-487
> ) = 64
> [pid 485] access(\"dump-487\", F_OK) = 0
> [pid 485] openat(AT_FDCWD, \"dump-487\", O_RDONLY) = 3
> [pid 485] read(3,
> \"\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0>\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\"...,
> 1024) = 1024
> [pid 485] read(3,
> \"\0\320\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\340\375\24\304\177\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\"...,
> 1024) = 292
> [pid 485] read(3, \"\", 1024) = 0
> [pid 485] close(3) = 0
> [pid 485] write(2, \"madvise08.c:208: \33[1;31mTFAIL: \33\"...,
> 74madvise08.c:208: [1;31mTFAIL: [0mNo sequence in dump after
> MADV_DODUMP.
>
> it seems that the data that was requested to be dumped with MADV_DODUMP is
> indeed completely absent.
>
> There was exactly one commit that got merged between next-20210115 and
> next-20120118
> related to core dumps: 8a3cc755b138 ("coredump: don't bother with
> do_truncate()").
> Adding Al Viro to Cc for that.
>
> Naresh, could you try reverting that patch?
This suspecting commit reverted and tested and the test case PASS.
commit 8a3cc755b13808eba74846dfd1033fcbc21f9a65
Author: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun Mar 8 09:16:37 2020 -0400
coredump: don't bother with do_truncate()
have dump_skip() just remember how much needs to be skipped,
leave actual seeks/writing zeroes to the next dump_emit()
or the end of coredump output, whichever comes first.
And instead of playing with do_truncate() in the end, just
write one NUL at the end of the last gap (if any).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 1 -
fs/coredump.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
include/linux/binfmts.h | 1 +
include/linux/coredump.h | 1 -
Test case output link,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2184975#L1369
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/2184972#L1358
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists