linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Activate Multi-MSI early when MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19ddad1517f0495d92c2248d04cf0d5c@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:39:51 +0000
From:   Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Activate Multi-MSI early when
 MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY is set



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@...nel.org]
> Sent: 23 January 2021 12:28
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>; Bjorn Helgaas
> <bhelgaas@...gle.com>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>; stable@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] genirq/msi: Activate Multi-MSI early when
> MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY is set
> 
> When MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY is set (which is the case for PCI),
> we perform the activation of the interrupt (which in the case of
> PCI results in the endpoint being programmed) as soon as the
> interrupt is allocated.
> 
> But it appears that this is only done for the first vector,
> introducing an inconsistent behaviour for PCI Multi-MSI.
> 
> Fix it by iterating over the number of vectors allocated to
> each MSI descriptor. This is easily achieved by introducing
> a new "for_each_msi_vector" iterator, together with a tiny
> bit of refactoring.
> 
> Fixes: f3b0946d629c ("genirq/msi: Make sure PCI MSIs are activated early")
> Reported-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  include/linux/msi.h |  6 ++++++
>  kernel/irq/msi.c    | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index 360a0a7e7341..aef35fd1cf11 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,12 @@ struct msi_desc {
>  	list_for_each_entry((desc), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
>  #define for_each_msi_entry_safe(desc, tmp, dev)	\
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe((desc), (tmp), dev_to_msi_list((dev)), list)
> +#define for_each_msi_vector(desc, __irq, dev)				\
> +	for_each_msi_entry((desc), (dev))				\
> +		if ((desc)->irq)					\
> +			for (__irq = (desc)->irq;			\
> +			     __irq < ((desc)->irq + (desc)->nvec_used);	\
> +			     __irq++)
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU
>  static inline const void *msi_desc_get_iommu_cookie(struct msi_desc *desc)
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index 2c0c4d6d0f83..d924676c8781 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -436,22 +436,22 @@ int __msi_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain
> *domain, struct device *dev,
> 
>  	can_reserve = msi_check_reservation_mode(domain, info, dev);
> 
> -	for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev) {
> -		virq = desc->irq;
> -		if (desc->nvec_used == 1)
> -			dev_dbg(dev, "irq %d for MSI\n", virq);
> -		else
> +	/*
> +	 * This flag is set by the PCI layer as we need to activate
> +	 * the MSI entries before the PCI layer enables MSI in the
> +	 * card. Otherwise the card latches a random msi message.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY))
> +		goto skip_activate;

This will change the dbg print behavior. From the commit f3b0946d629c,
it looks like the below dev_dbg() code was there for !MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY
case as well. Not sure how much this matters though.

Thanks,
Shameer

> +
> +	for_each_msi_vector(desc, i, dev) {
> +		if (desc->irq == i) {
> +			virq = desc->irq;
>  			dev_dbg(dev, "irq [%d-%d] for MSI\n",
>  				virq, virq + desc->nvec_used - 1);
> -		/*
> -		 * This flag is set by the PCI layer as we need to activate
> -		 * the MSI entries before the PCI layer enables MSI in the
> -		 * card. Otherwise the card latches a random msi message.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY))
> -			continue;
> +		}
> 
> -		irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, desc->irq);
> +		irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, i);
>  		if (!can_reserve) {
>  			irqd_clr_can_reserve(irq_data);
>  			if (domain->flags & IRQ_DOMAIN_MSI_NOMASK_QUIRK)
> @@ -462,28 +462,24 @@ int __msi_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain
> *domain, struct device *dev,
>  			goto cleanup;
>  	}
> 
> +skip_activate:
>  	/*
>  	 * If these interrupts use reservation mode, clear the activated bit
>  	 * so request_irq() will assign the final vector.
>  	 */
>  	if (can_reserve) {
> -		for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev) {
> -			irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, desc->irq);
> +		for_each_msi_vector(desc, i, dev) {
> +			irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, i);
>  			irqd_clr_activated(irq_data);
>  		}
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> 
>  cleanup:
> -	for_each_msi_entry(desc, dev) {
> -		struct irq_data *irqd;
> -
> -		if (desc->irq == virq)
> -			break;
> -
> -		irqd = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, desc->irq);
> -		if (irqd_is_activated(irqd))
> -			irq_domain_deactivate_irq(irqd);
> +	for_each_msi_vector(desc, i, dev) {
> +		irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, i);
> +		if (irqd_is_activated(irq_data))
> +			irq_domain_deactivate_irq(irq_data);
>  	}
>  	msi_domain_free_irqs(domain, dev);
>  	return ret;
> --
> 2.29.2