linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf tools fixes for v5.11, 2nd batch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210125163906.GD617095@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:39:06 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf tools fixes for v5.11, 2nd batch

Em Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 01:59:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:52 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Test results in the signed tag at:
 
> Side note: I'd actually prefer if you didn't do this. These big things
> end up being (a hidden) part of the merge commit (and that's how the
> tag verification works after-the-fact: ie I don't just verify the tag
> when I pull, you can also do the verification later), and it really
> makes zero sense to add 28kB of data to each merge just because you
> hid them in the signed tag.
 
> It would actually be better to have it just in the email at the end,
> not in the tag.
 
> Please?

Sure, intention was to record that tests were done and where it was
done, and at the same time not to bother you with test results in the
pull request.

But as you point out and was discussed somewhere else, it doesn't ends
up accessible upstream, so I'll do as you suggest and just leave it in
the cover letter, as I did in the past when submitting to Ingo.

Thanks,

- Arnaldo