[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210125165451.GT827@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:54:51 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 08/11] secretmem: add memcg accounting
On Thu 21-01-21 14:27:20, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Account memory consumed by secretmem to memcg. The accounting is updated
> when the memory is actually allocated and freed.
What does this mean? What are the lifetime rules?
[...]
> +static int secretmem_account_pages(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + /*
> + * seceremem caches are unreclaimable kernel allocations, so treat
> + * them as unreclaimable slab memory for VM statistics purposes
> + */
> + mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B,
> + PAGE_SIZE << order);
A lot of memcg accounted memory is not reclaimable. Why do you abuse
SLAB counter when this is not a slab owned memory? Why do you use the
kmem accounting API when __GFP_ACCOUNT should give you the same without
this details?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists