[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YA7+Sl1UYnwveHfE@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:22:18 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Some optimizations related to sgx
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 02:29:02PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> This is an optimization of a set of sgx-related codes, each of which
> is independent of the patch. Because the second and third patches have
> conflicting dependencies, these patches are put together.
>
> ---
> v3 changes:
> * split free_cnt count and spin lock optimization into two patches
>
> v2 changes:
> * review suggested changes
>
> Tianjia Zhang (5):
> selftests/x86: Simplify the code to get vdso base address in sgx
> x86/sgx: Optimize the locking range in sgx_sanitize_section()
> x86/sgx: Optimize the free_cnt count in sgx_epc_section
> x86/sgx: Allows ioctl PROVISION to execute before CREATE
> x86/sgx: Remove redundant if conditions in sgx_encl_create
I remember asking about previous patches. I don't recall of getting
any responses to anything basically.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists