lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3F91181A-EDF2-4F01-9839-17B40D6EA07F@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:35:49 +0100
From:   Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Jia Cheng Hu <jia.jiachenghu@...il.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree



> Il giorno 25 gen 2021, alle ore 10:40, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> ha scritto:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>  d4fc3640ff36 ("block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker injection")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>  Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject their I/O")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>  - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: 13a857a4c4e8 ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject their I/O")
> 

Hi Jens,
how to proceed in such a case (with patches already applied by you)?
Shall I send you a v2 with only this change?

Thanks,
Paolo

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ