| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1611544603.1248.4.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:16:43 +0800
From: mtk15103 <hailong.fan@...iatek.com>
To: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
CC: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Chen-Tsung Hsieh <chentsung@...omium.org>,
<gtk_pangao@...iatek.com>, Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@...iatek.com>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, <zhengnan.chen@...iatek.com>,
<hailong.fan@...iatek>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: mediatek: Fix trigger type setting
follow for unexpected interrupt
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 18:54 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:44 AM mtk15103 <hailong.fan@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 20:13 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:09 PM mtk15103 <hailong.fan@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 16:55 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:52 PM Hailong Fan <hailong.fan@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When flipping the polarity will be generated interrupt under certain
> > > > > > circumstances, but GPIO external signal has not changed.
> > > > > > Then, mask the interrupt before polarity setting, and clear the
> > > > > > unexpected interrupt after trigger type setting completed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hailong Fan <hailong.fan@...iatek.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Resend since some server reject.
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > > > > > index 22736f60c16c..3acda6bb401e 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
> > > > > > @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static void mtk_eint_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > > > > > static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > struct mtk_eint *eint = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > > > > > + unsigned int unmask;
> > > > >
> > > > > bool?
> > > > Yes,thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > > u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq & 0x1f);
> > > > > > void __iomem *reg;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -173,6 +174,13 @@ static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > > > else
> > > > > > eint->dual_edge[d->hwirq] = 0;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > + if (!mtk_eint_get_mask(eint, d->hwirq)) {
> > > > > > + mtk_eint_mask(d);
> > > > > > + unmask = 1;
> > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > + unmask = 0;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)) {
> > > > > > reg = mtk_eint_get_offset(eint, d->hwirq, eint->regs->pol_clr);
> > > > > > writel(mask, reg);
> > > > > > @@ -189,8 +197,9 @@ static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > > > > > writel(mask, reg);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (eint->dual_edge[d->hwirq])
> > > > > > - mtk_eint_flip_edge(eint, d->hwirq);
> > > > >
> > > > > Why are you dropping this? Aren't we at risk to miss the first edge
> > > > > after mtk_eint_set_type is called?
> > > > mtk_eint_unmask() will do it.
> > > > If unmask != 1, user need to call mtk_eint_unmask() to enable the
> > > > interrupt before use it, thanks.
> > >
> > > Makes sense, I just have one more worry:
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c#L122
> > >
> > > mtk_eint_unmask unmasks the interrupt _before_ the edge is flipped,
> > > could this cause a spurious interrupt? On any unmask operation -- not
> > > just on mtk_eint_set_type (so this is technically another problem,
> > > that should be fixed as a separate patch)
> >
> > This situation will not happen.
> >
> > Spurious interrupt occur condition: edge irq polarity value is same with
> > input signal.
> > e.g.
> > Default value: GPIO input is high, trigger type is falling_edge.
> > User want modify trigger type is rising_edge under some certain
> > circumstances, it will generate spurious interrupt but external signal
> > maintain high.
> > So we need ack interrupt after trigger_type setting is completed.
> >
> > mtk_eint_flip_edge is for dual_edge, the polarity setting based on
> > current gpio input signal:
> > if (input == high)
> > polarity = low; /* falling_edge */
> > else
> > polarity = high; /* rising_edge */
> > Then it's not cause a spurious interrupt.
>
> Okay let me try to make sure I follow:
>
> - Say interrupt is currently IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING (and GPIO is high and stable)
> - mtk_eint_set_type(d, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
> - mtk_eint_mask(d)
> - (no mask changed, just eint->dual_edge)
> - mtk_eint_ack(d) (not actually needed in this example)
> - mtk_eint_unmask(d)
> - HW reg unmask (can't generate an interrupt as anything that would
> have happened is acked already -- even with different previous/new
> types than my example)
> - flip_edge (will swap polarity as needed but can't generate
> interrupt as it won't set the polarity to be the same as the current
> GPIO state)
>
> Okay, I think I'm convinced.
>
> Please fix the nits and then you can add
Thanks a lot for your comments.
V2 patch has been sent to you, please help review it, thx.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
>
> > > > > > + mtk_eint_ack(d);
> > > > > > + if (unmask == 1)
> > > > >
> > > > > Just `if (unmask)`
> > > > Yes,thanks.
> > > > > > + mtk_eint_unmask(d);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > 2.18.0
> > > >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists