[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161160636226.76967.16862386814744159828@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:26:02 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/panel-simple: Don't wait longer for HPD than hpd_absent_delay
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2021-01-15 14:44:17)
> If a panel has an hpd_absent_delay specified then we know exactly how
> long the maximum time is before HPD must be asserted. That means we
> can use it as a timeout for polling the HPD pin instead of using an
> arbitrary timeout. This is especially useful for dealing with panels
> that periodically fail to power on and need to be retried. We can
> detect the problem sooner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists