lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161160636226.76967.16862386814744159828@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:26:02 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/panel-simple: Don't wait longer for HPD than hpd_absent_delay

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2021-01-15 14:44:17)
> If a panel has an hpd_absent_delay specified then we know exactly how
> long the maximum time is before HPD must be asserted.  That means we
> can use it as a timeout for polling the HPD pin instead of using an
> arbitrary timeout.  This is especially useful for dealing with panels
> that periodically fail to power on and need to be retried.  We can
> detect the problem sooner.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ