lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210125205048.GA1066705@BV030612LT>
Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:50:48 +0200
From:   Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] regulator: Add regulator driver for ATC260x PMICs

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:23:11PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:23:29PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Add support for the DC-DC converters and LDO regulators found in
> > the ATC2603C and ATC2609A chip variants of the Actions Semi ATC260x
> > family of PMICs.
> 
> Please do not submit new versions of already applied patches, please
> submit incremental updates to the existing code.  Modifying existing
> commits creates problems for other users building on top of those
> commits so it's best practice to only change pubished git commits if
> absolutely essential.

The patches applied to 'for-next' branches were not modified, but I have
(wrongly) assumed I need to keep them in the series until they are
eventually merged into master.

So, if I understand correctly, I should have dropped them from the patch
series as soon as they had been queued, and only if they need some
additional work, I can re-add them as incremental updates.

Thanks,
Cristi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ