linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/88] 5.4.93-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:21:48 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, pavel@...x.de,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, sagar.kadam@...ive.com,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/88] 5.4.93-rc2 review

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:58:53PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 16:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:43:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 15:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.93 release.
> > > > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:42:44 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.93-rc2.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > As Daniel pointed in the other email thread,
> > > riscv failed build:
> > >      * clang-10-defconfig -  FAILED
> > >      * clang-11-defconfig -  FAILED
> > >      * gcc-8-defconfig -  FAILED
> > >      * gcc-9-defconfig -  FAILED
> > >      * gcc-10-defconfig -  FAILED
> > >
> > > the riscv build failed due to the below commit.
> > >
> > > > Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
> > > >     dts: phy: add GPIO number and active state used for phy reset
> > >
> > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8
> > > O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=riscv
> > > CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc'
> > > 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc'
> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts:88.27-28 syntax error
> > > FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> > >
> > > Build log,
> > > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/986616680
> >
> > Crap, forgot that one.  Will go drop it now and push out a -rc3.  Is
> > this an issue for 5.10.y?
> 
> No.
> 5.10 builds are successful.

Wonderful, thanks for letting me know.

This round of kernels were a pain for some reason...

greg k-h