linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: smp: remove unused variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210126135227.yiiqg7ci3gxhqzpf@the-dreams.de>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:52:27 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: smp: remove unused variable


> What I'm saying is... don't expect me to always review patches that
> are for fixing code that other people have contributed - I wish those
> who introduce regressions would stick around and attend to breakage
> that they cause, instead of hoping that someone else will do that
> for them. It's a reasonable ask.

Yes, I am much with you here.

> Thanks - I'll get around to it in due course. Since I'm no longer
> supported as 32-bit ARM maintainer, I only apply patches once or maybe
> twice per kernel release. Quite how long this will be sustainable for,
> I've no idea (it depends whether I get any actual paying work, and
> how much.)

I didn't know that, thanks for the heads up. I understand that problem
and hope there will be income for the work you do.