[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0nZSejOkQScYBPnDP+2H_bo2nmtOqxW1j-F4tb6dbLAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:09:02 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@...ndries.io>
Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: simplify i2c access
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:50 PM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
<jorge@...ndries.io> wrote:
> On 26/01/21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:08 AM Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> >
> > The fixes tag only describes which commit introduced the bug, it is irrelevant
> > what type of bug this is.
>
> thanks Arnd.
>
> what compiler warnings are defined as kernel bugs? is there a list
> that you use when tracking these?
I consider any warning a bug, a normal kernel build should always be
warning free.
I sometimes send fixes for warnings that only happen with 'make W=1',
'make C=1' or even 'make W=2'. For those, I would only categorize them
as a real bug if they actually cause runtime misbehavior, but there are
some -Wsomething flags that we would like to enable by default in the
future.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists