linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <161165361960.29150.15515544628767131483@build.alporthouse.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:33:39 +0000
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-01-25 21:46:19)
> Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:33:48)
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit
> > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")?
> > 
> > I wonder, maybe actually this one is causing troubles?
> > 
> > Chris, would it be possible to check what happens if you revert only
> > bde9cfa3afe4?
> 
> Queued for CI, will be run in about an hour.

I ran just the revert of bde9cfa3afe4 through CI twice, on both occasions
all machines failed to boot. 
-Chris