linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: qcom: Remove incorrect usage of QCOM_WDT_ENABLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c9d5e19-7ddd-345d-aa2d-b4fb48d9b4df@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 07:23:00 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>,
        jorge@...ndries.io
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: qcom: Remove incorrect usage of
 QCOM_WDT_ENABLE_IRQ

On 1/26/21 7:02 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> As per register documentation, QCOM_WDT_ENABLE_IRQ which is BIT(1)
> of watchdog control register is wakeup interrupt enable bit and
> not related to bark interrupt at all, BIT(0) is used for that.
> So remove incorrect usage of this bit when supporting bark irq for
> pre-timeout notification. Currently with this bit set and bark
> interrupt specified, pre-timeout notification and/or watchdog
> reset/bite does not occur.
> 
> Fixes: 36375491a439 ("watchdog: qcom: support pre-timeout when the bark irq is available")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>

Assuming that pretimeout _does_ work with this patch applied,

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

> ---
> 
> Reading the conversations from when qcom pre-timeout support was
> added [1], Bjorn already had mentioned it was not right to touch this
> bit, not sure which SoC the pre-timeout was tested on at that time,
> but I have tested this on SDM845, SM8150, SC7180 and watchdog bark
> and bite does not occur with enabling this bit with the bark irq
> specified in DT.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20190906174009.GC11938@tuxbook-pro/
> 
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c | 13 +------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
> index 7cf0f2ec649b..e38a87ffe5f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/qcom-wdt.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ enum wdt_reg {
>  };
>  
>  #define QCOM_WDT_ENABLE		BIT(0)
> -#define QCOM_WDT_ENABLE_IRQ	BIT(1)
>  
>  static const u32 reg_offset_data_apcs_tmr[] = {
>  	[WDT_RST] = 0x38,
> @@ -63,16 +62,6 @@ struct qcom_wdt *to_qcom_wdt(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>  	return container_of(wdd, struct qcom_wdt, wdd);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int qcom_get_enable(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> -{
> -	int enable = QCOM_WDT_ENABLE;
> -
> -	if (wdd->pretimeout)
> -		enable |= QCOM_WDT_ENABLE_IRQ;
> -
> -	return enable;
> -}
> -
>  static irqreturn_t qcom_wdt_isr(int irq, void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct watchdog_device *wdd = arg;
> @@ -91,7 +80,7 @@ static int qcom_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>  	writel(1, wdt_addr(wdt, WDT_RST));
>  	writel(bark * wdt->rate, wdt_addr(wdt, WDT_BARK_TIME));
>  	writel(wdd->timeout * wdt->rate, wdt_addr(wdt, WDT_BITE_TIME));
> -	writel(qcom_get_enable(wdd), wdt_addr(wdt, WDT_EN));
> +	writel(QCOM_WDT_ENABLE, wdt_addr(wdt, WDT_EN));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>